Saturday, 7 December 2019

New top story from Time: ‘My Image Is Being Associated With Sexism.’ Husband in Viral Peloton Ad Speaks Out About Enduring ‘Negative Bandwagon’ on Social Media



The husband in the infamous Peloton ad has spoken out. Sean Hunter, an actor and a teacher whose Instagram username is now “pelotonhusband“, spoke to Good Morning America on Friday, saying the public’s response has taken the ad down a dark path.

“My image is being associated with sexism, with the patriarchy, with abuse, for example,” he says. “That’s not who I am.”

Hunter plays the role of the husband in the now-infamous commercial, which has received more than 4.4 million views on YouTube and sparked internet outrage by people. In the ad’s opening scene, Hunter’s character gifts his wife a Peloton indoor bike. She then thanks him a year later as they rewatch a compilation video cycling through her greatest hits. “A year ago, I didn’t realize how much this would change me,” she says. “Thank you.”

It wasn’t long before social media was flexing its best creative muscles, with reactions memes, parody videos and bemused commentary going viral. Peloton’s stock went down after the backlash. The company responded on Wednesday in a statement to CNBC, saying “Our holiday spot was created to celebrate that fitness and wellness journey. While we’re disappointed in how some have misinterpreted this commercial, we are encouraged by — and grateful for — the outpouring of support we’ve received from those who understand what we were trying to communicate.”

Hunter also spoke to Psychology Today about the backlash. “I pride myself on being a great teacher and developing actor, and I can only hope that this affects neither. I’m grappling with the negative opinions, he said. “The aftermath of the commercial has left me with more questions than answers, and this is only half the story. I reflect on what my co-actor must be dealing with, as she’s the other 25 seconds of the story.”

During his interview with GMA, Hunter called out social media’s negative impacts on society. “Once something goes viral and it turns negative, people jump on that negative bandwagon and start to create any dialogue that they want,” he told GMA.

New top story from Time: Why Military Bases Have Proved Vulnerable to Mass Shootings



Two fatal shootings in one week at military installations in the United States have led to questions regarding the security measures in place at military bases across the country.

The latest shooting happened on Friday at a Naval Air Station in Pensacola, Fla. Three people were killed, and many more wounded, after a gunman opened fire in a classroom on the base. It was the second shooting a military base in three days; on Wednesday, a shooting at the Pearl Harbor Naval Shipyard in Hawaii left two people dead and a third wounded.

The two shootings — and others, including a mass shooting in 2009 at Fort Hood in Killeen, Texas that claimed 13 lives — show that military bases are vulnerable to armed attackers in similar ways to other sites targeted by shooters, such as schools, movie theaters and workplaces.

Alexander Deguzman, a retired Air Force Staff Sergeant, says that living on a military base is like living in an enclosed city. Despite public perception, people on military bases are no more armed than other parts of the country. Most of the people on military bases are not carrying armed weapons.

“You have grocery stores, schools, houses and places where people go to work. The only people that have armed weapons are designated personnel [like military police],” Deguzman tells TIME. “Life on a base is really like [life in] a normal city, just gated.”

Military leaders acknowledge that protecting military installations — and the people who work there — from mass shootings is a major undertaking. Deguzman, who now works as a real estate in Los Angeles, was responsible for identifying security solutions and gaps on military installations when he served.

[An] active shooter is something that is very in the front of our minds,” Capt. Tim Kinsella, the commanding officer at the Pensacola station, said at a press conference on Friday. According to Capt. Kinsella, guns were banned in the facility where the shooting happened. (As of Friday afternoon, officials at the base have not released any information about how the shooter was able to bring a firearm into the classroom.)

The 2009 Fort Hood mass shooting is considered to be the deadliest shooting to occur on a military base. 13 people were killed, while another 30 were left injured. Five years later ,another shooting happened at the Fort Hood base, when a gunman went on a shooting spree killing three people and injuring 14. The shooter then killed himself.

In 2013, 12 workers at the Washington Navy Yard in Washington, D.C. were killed by a military contractor, who was later killed by security officials. And in 2015, two military installations in Chattanooga, Tenn., were attacked by a gunman who killed four people before he was shot by police.

Capt. Kinsella said that military personnel and civilians at the Pensacola base train regularly to prepare for potential shootings. “Security is ever-changing and ever-evolving…we look at lessons learned from this and if necessary we will [make changes],” Kinsella said at the press conference. “I’m very very proud of the response of my security department…I think it could have been a lot lot worse.”

He did not offer any specific details regarding the base’s security plans.

Deguzman adds that the military needs to continue to educate the public and their own personnel on warning signs that could prevent mass shootings from happening.

“The military has always been dialed-in, and systematic in how they respond to these types of incidents,” Deguzman says. “Everybody needs to be aware of what’s going on around them so the signs can be identified beforehand.”

French Strike Aims to Save an Envied, but Convoluted, Approach to Pensions


By BY LIZ ALDERMAN from NYT World https://ift.tt/2OVIL3y

Eli Manning Is Ready for Another Chance


By BY DANIELLE ALLENTUCK from NYT Sports https://ift.tt/2sUcEc3

Ron Leibman, Tony Winner for ‘Angels,’ Is Dead at 82


By BY NEIL GENZLINGER from NYT Theater https://ift.tt/2YtO9ht

Supreme Court Won’t Allow Federal Executions to Resume


By BY ADAM LIPTAK from NYT U.S. https://ift.tt/34To79T

New top story from Time: White House Opting Out of House Judiciary Committee’s Next Impeachment Hearing



(WASHINGTON) — The White House will not participate in the House Judiciary Committee’s next impeachment hearing, a senior Trump administration official said Friday in another sign the president has accepted that he is likely to be impeached by the House.

The decision came in a letter from White House counsel Pat Cipollone, ahead of a Friday evening deadline set by the Democratic chairman of the Judiciary Committee, Rep. Jerrold Nadler of New York.

The two-paragraph letter did not expressly state the White House’s refusal to participate. But a senior administration official told The Associated Press after the two-paragraph letter was released that it was the point it was intended to communicate.

In the letter, Cipollone accuses House Democrats leading the inquiry of wasting America’s time “with this charade” and charges that adopting articles of impeachment against President Donald Trump would amount to a “reckless abuse of power.”

“Whatever course you choose, as the President has recently stated: ‘if you are going to impeach me, do it now, fast, so we can have a fair trial in the Senate, and so that our country can get back to business,'” Cipollone wrote, citing a tweet from Trump this week.

Read more: The Trump Campaign Has Raised Millions Off Impeachment — And Facebook Is One of Its Most Powerful Tools

The decision comes one day after House Speaker Nancy Pelosi announced she had instructed the committee chairmen leading the inquiry into Trump’s dealings with Ukraine to move forward with drafting articles of impeachment . Trump is accused of abusing his power and compromising national security by pushing the president of Ukraine to investigate his Democratic political rivals as his administration was withholding crucial security aid to the country.

Nadler said the House was disappointed by Trump’s decision, given the complaints by the president and his allies that the process has been unfair.

“If the president has no good response to the allegations, then he would not want to appear before the committee,” Nadler said in a written statement. “Having declined this opportunity, he cannot claim that the process is unfair. The president’s failure will not prevent us from carrying out our solemn constitutional duty.”

Pelosi said earlier Friday, when questioned about the possibility that the White House would decline to participate, that this was the opportunity for the president to “show innocence.”

“But they have a consciousness of guilt, and that’s why they may not show up,” she told reporters.

The White House had faced the deadline to inform the House Judiciary Committee whether it intended to have legal representation at a hearing scheduled for Monday that will focus on the recently released House Intelligence Committee report outlining its findings against Trump.

The White House also declined to attend the Judiciary Committee’s first hearing, held Wednesday, that featured legal experts outlining the history of impeachment and its constitutional role.

Trump and his aides have made clear that they now see his impeachment in the House as inevitable and have shifted their focus to the Senate, where Trump allies remain confident Democrats will not have the votes to convict and remove him from office.

Associated Press writer Zeke Miller contributed to this report.

Report Details Interactions Between F.B.I. and Dossier Author

By BY SCOTT SHANE from NYT U.S. https://ift.tt/36h67GK